next up previous contents
Next: References Up: Chapter 9 Section 4 Previous: 6 SU(3)-breaking effects in

7 SU(3)-breaking effects in the anomalous (W-Z) sector

We shall now extend the above treatment to processes related to the anomaly or Wess-Zumino lagrangian. Notice that introducing our value , eq.(79), in eq.(76) for , leads to KeV quite in line with the datum [13] KeV. This encourages to try a full treatment, similar to the one discussed so far, to the anomalous sector. Our purpose is to calculate the effects of SU(3) symmetry breaking in radiative decays of vector mesons, we have then to consider the part of the Lagrangian related to the WZ anomaly and we can expect, in analogy with what was done so far, that these effects will require the introduction of one more parameter in the discussion, which will be called (see later). It will then be necessary to reconsider all the successfull numerical tests obtained so far and try to perform a single global fit to both the anomalous and non-anomalous sector with the three SU(3) breaking parameters . We shall first proceed by obtaining relations between the relevant couplings in the anomalous sector and try to determine the parameters, independently of what was done before.

We start with vector--vector--pseudoscalar meson (VVP) interactions as contained in the SU(3)-symmetric VVP lagrangian introduced in ref. [2]. Inserting as before the additional, symmetry breaking term in an appropriate way to get an hermitian Lagrangian, the total broken Lagrangian can now be written as

 

where , is the breaking parameter in the anomalous sector, and is the strong VVP coupling constant, where the -dependent factor (see eq.(76)) already includes the part of the effects of SU(3) breaking coming from the renormalization of the pseudoscalars fields in the lagrangian.

With this conventions, is the coupling constant (see section 4) which contains no SU(3)-breaking and whose value can be obtained from the experimental radiative decay width [13] MeV. can also be obtained extracting a value for from and decay data [13]. Using MeV, we then obtain MeV in good agreement with the experimental result. In our normalization, the radiative decay widths for vector mesons are given by

 

where the relevant coupling constants take into account that these decays proceed via intermediate vector mesons . Thanks to this, one immediately recovers the successful relation (10), , coming from the WZ anomaly and satisfied by the experimental decay rate.

The coupling constants are easily obtained from the lagrangian in eq.(74) defined in the previous section. One then obtains

 

which are the SU(3) broken modifications of the usual couplings with all equal masses (38). It is interesting to see how one can achieve both consistency with the unbroken case successful relations as well as with the experimental value of the V-masses, if one choose a value for the parameter such that

 

This is achieved by choosing , not far from the range of values for which a good fit to a large number of other low energy constant was obtained in the previous section. With this choice, we then have and using eqs.(86), (87) and the broken VVP Lagrangian (85) to extract the couplings, we obtain the following expressions for the coupling constants

 

The parameter is the one introduced in section 4, eq.(49), to account for the small contamination of non--strange (strange) quarks in the () meson. Notice that, because of eq.(88), the parameter disappears from the above relations, which now contain only and . The value of the anomalous breaking parameter can be directly obtained from the ratio between the experimental decay widths [13] and . The ratio depends only from and leads immediately to , whereas for we can use eq.(76) and the experimental results

which lead to the value as obtained in the previous section.

At this point, the set of SU(3) breaking parameters can be put to a test by calculating the V radiative decay widths following eq.(86) with the coupling constants given by eq.(89). Our results, obtained using and , as well as and for the symmetry breaking parameters, are shown in Table 4. For comparison we also include the corresponding experimental decay widths as taken from ref.[13] (in the case we have averaged for neutral and charged decays). The description of all these data turns out to be quite satisfactory, with SU(3)-breaking effects playing a central role in some cases. As already noted by Hajuj [33], a non-vanishing value for (thus achieving ) is essential to reduce the predicted and decay rates to their experimental values. Our value is also crucial to improve the results of ref.[33] (particularly, for the radiative decays) where such a source of SU(3)-breaking has been neglected. As mentioned, the other SU(3)-breaking parameter is fixed here so as to satisfy the relation .

To enlarge our discussion, we have also tried to fit the radiative decays with a different set of parameters. The choice, which is shown in Table 4 was based on the use of the set and , which was considered optimal in the previous section, when chiral loop contributions were added to the vector meson terms. Notice that because the use of eq.(88) would introduce an error in eqs.(89) for this value of , we refrain from using it in the whole set of those equations, which now come to depends explicitly upon the parameter . On its turn, this means that the whole numerical dependence of those equations upon the parameters and changes and we obtain a different set of optimal values, which are in line with the results of refs. [33] and [2], and shown in last column of Table 4. Again the agreement is quite good and the decision of how to optimize the use of our lagrangians remains open waiting for improved data and analysis.

mm

 
Table 4:  

In summary, well-known SU(3)-breaking effects have been shown to be easily introduced in effective lagrangians incorporating vector-mesons. In particular, the VVP interactions, related to radiative vector-meson decays -- for which accurate new data are expected -- and to the anomalous decays, are accurately described, improving the results of previous related work [33].



next up previous contents
Next: References Up: Chapter 9 Section 4 Previous: 6 SU(3)-breaking effects in



Carlos E.Piedrafita