next up previous
Next: 4 Weak decay of Up: Chapter 12 Section 1 Previous: 2 Production of Hypernuclei

3 The structure of hypernuclei

In the past Sections we have already pointed out that the dynamic of an hypernucleus is essentially ruled by the following facts:

i) the is not Pauli-blocked,

ii) the experiences an interaction with the nucleons appreciably weaker than the N-N force.

Point ii) is to a substantial extent related to the zero isospin of the , which prevents the latter from exchanging an isovector meson, like the pion or the rho, with a nucleon and bears relevant implications.

Indeed the relative weakness of the -N interaction entails, as it was already observed, that the shell structure is not disrupted by the insertion of the into a nucleus and that the mean field binding the is not as deep as the one binding the nucleon.

Moreover, and importantly, the lack of a strong tensor component, largely carried by the pion and the rho in the -N interaction, might render the spin-orbit central potential in the hypernuclei very weak. And in fact the spectrum of , shown in Fig.3, is consistent with an energy difference of less than 0.3 MeV between the spin-orbit partners and . Thus the conjecture that the strong one--body spin--orbit potential, which is the central element for obtaining the proper organization of the shells in normal nuclei, is actually due to the two--body tensor force, is significantly supported by the experimental findings in hypernuclei.

An alternative explanation for the puny spin-orbit mean field in hypernuclei may come from the recognition that in the constituent quark model the u and d quarks in the are coupled to zero angular momentum: hence the spin of the appears to be carried by the s quark alone. One could accordingly conjecture that the latter is rather inert as far as the interaction with the other quarks is concerned. This explanation needs further elaboration in view of the recent experiments on the spin structure of the nucleon.

Although two examples have already been provided concerning the survival of the shell structure (Figs. 3 and 4) in a hypernucleus yet the spectrum of the Yttrium (Z=40) displays the pattern of the single particle levels so strikingly that it is still worth to be shown (Fig.5). Especially because it is the heaviest among the hypernuclei till now explored where the shells are so neatly seen. It is obtained via the reaction

at an incident pion momentum of 1.05 GeV/c and for a scattering angle .

 
Figure 5: The excitation spectrum for the reaction at 1.05 GeV/c and . Solid line: a theoretical calculation. Dotted line: the contributions (from ref.[15]).

Again the hypernuclear states show up as prominent peaks appearing in the spectrum. They belong to the configuration having a neutron hole in the single particle level and the in all the orbits starting from the down to the . We thus see that the indeed sits in the inner s-level when the hypernucleus is in its ground state.

As previously discussed this occurrence accounts for the lack of saturation experimentally found in the binding energy. The latter is displayed in Fig.6, which complements the data quoted in Table 1, as a function of . The power of A should in fact correspond to the next to the leading term in the expansion of (here defined as a positive quantity) in terms of the mass number A. Physically it mainly represents a kinetic energy correction (see(4)) to the bulk value of the binding energy. One can thus write

where the coefficient just provides a reasonable fit and the infinite nuclear matter value = 27 MeV is obtained in a relativistic mean field theory. Its difference from the corresponding quantity for a nucleon in ordinary nuclear matter, namely =16 MeV, is clearly due to the kinetic energy.

 
Figure 6: The observed binding energies of single--particle states. The curves correspond to a calculation with an adjusted density--dependent non--local interaction (from ref.[15]).

In Fig.6 it is indeed observed that for the available data, which end at the hypernucleus , the heavier the hypernucleus, the larger the binding energy. Also shown in the Figure is the behaviour with A of the energies of the excited states of the hypernuclei corresponding to configurations with a sitting in the various shell model orbits, as previously discussed: thus a family of curves, one for each single particle level, shows up, all of them converging to the nuclear matter value . They are calculated starting from a Woods--Saxon potential well, namely

 

with

 

and no spin-orbit potential.

Although the curves appear to nicely fit the available experimental data, a closer scrutiny reveals that some amount of non--locality is actually required in the binding potential. Clearly the Woods-Saxon well above referred to is only meant to phenomenologically represent the mean field acting on a in a hypernucleus. It is of significance that while the radius R and the surface thickness of (17) are close to the values characterizing the shell model potential of the S=0 nuclei, its depth is about one third less. In this connection it should also be mentioned that the binding energy of the is presently not understood.

This might suggest, in line with the previous considerations on the spin-orbit term, that the s quark inside a interacts only very weakly with the u and d quarks of the other nucleons. In fact such a conjecture would also account for the value of about 27 MeV above quoted for , which is in fact roughly two third of the potential energy per nucleon (about 40 MeV) in infinite nuclear matter ( we have seen that a implanted in nuclear matter would have essentially no kinetic energy).

Another feature of relevance in the hypernuclear structure relates to the nature of the single particle states of the . These appear to experience little, if any at all, fragmentation, even the deeply bound ones. However one must recall that the energy resolution involved in this experiment is several MeV so that no conclusions can be drawn at present time.

In accord with the above is the analysis of the dynamical behaviour of the hypernuclei, in the energy regime above the emission threshold, carried out in terms of a -nucleus optical potential. The real part of the latter has in fact been found to be positive and about 30 MeV strong, whereas the strength of the negative imaginary part does not exceed a couple of MeV, much less that the corresponding quantity experienced by a nucleon.

This remarkable stability of the single particle quantum states of the in the mean field generated by the nuclear medium is indeed remarkable and worth to be explored in the appropriate theoretical framework. In fact the above discussed Wood--Saxon phenomenological potential should actually be obtained through a Hartree calculation starting from some realistic -N interaction.

In this connection if is worth noticing that a , implanted into a nucleus, not only feels the Hartree field generated by its own interaction with all the other nucleons, but in turn affects the Hartree--Fock field felt individually by each nucleon. In this perspective the Hartree--Fock problem acquires a new dimension in hypernuclei. Formally this can be stated by saying that the two one--body hamiltonian

and

should be self--consistently dealt with simultaneously.

Some estimates of the impact of the on the HF mean field acting on a nucleon predict a change in the single particle energies as large as MeV for the deeply bound nucleons and of about one MeV for valence nucleons. No experimental evidence for this effect is presently available. This is unfortunate because it has been argued [8] that a partial deconfinement of the quarks inside the could be reflected by a wide spacing, say 5 MeV, among the most bound single particle levels inside a heavy hypernucleus like .

Concerning the two--body force to be utilized as a input the HF framework it should be observed that in hypernuclear physics a new self--consistency requirement, to be added to the usual one, is met at a deeper level in the sense that the two nucleon--nucleon () and --nucleon () interactions are clearly interrelated.

One of the few approaches dovetailed to deal with this difficulty has been carried out by Nagels et al.[9] starting from the so--called Nijmegen OBE (one boson exchange) NN potential, specifically designed to account for the NN scattering data. These authors then solve the associated Bethe--Goldstone equation for the --N scattering in the medium thus obtaining a G--matrix, i.e. a density--dependent --N interaction.

For conveniency the latter, commonly referred to as the YNG force, has all its components expressed via the combination of three gaussians of different ranges. The YNG potential turns out to have the following structure

 

i.e. it is made up of a central, spin--orbit, anti spin--orbit and tensor term. In (20) , is the relative orbital angular momentum, the total spin, the tensor operator and the Fermi momentum.

A notable feature of the YNG force, in addition to its rather weak tensor component, is its strong short range repulsion. The latter is analogous to the repulsive core of the NN interaction, but has radically different consequences. In fact when the diagonal matrix elements of the force are taken with, e.g., the --N pair sitting in the configuration , then a "repulsive" J=0 matrix element is found to occur (see Fig.7).

 
Figure 7: J-dependence of the and NN diagonal matrix--elements (from ref.[4]).

This "anti--pairing" N force is in stunning contrast with the "attractive" pairing NN potential, which has, as it is well--known, momentous consequences on the nuclear dynamics. It reflects a different balance between the short range repulsion and the intermediate range attraction occurring in the N channel: indeed a can approach more closely a nucleon than another nucleon can do.

At a more fundamental level attempts have been made to derive the baryon-baryon potential from first principles. One model calculates the effect of the exchange of bosons (OBE). In another the quark-quark force obtained from a one gluon exchange is used in a cluster model. In addition the influence of three-body forces has not been evaluated. A detailed discussion of these attempts would take us too far afield. Suffice to say the fundamental basis of the hyperon-nucleon interaction is still not known.

The YNG potential, as well as others more phenomenological versions of the N interaction, has been extensively applied to analyze and predict a number of hypernuclear spectra. Since in a hypernucleus three kinds of particles, the proton, the neutron and the are coexisting, states characterized by new symmetries should appear. To display the latter more transparently it is of much convenience to classify the states according to the symmetry.

An often considered example in this connection is the hypernucleus viewed as , whose simple shell model configuration belongs to the irreducible representation of with in addition a particle. One thus gets three sets (bands) of states, which with a compact notation can be labelled as , and . Now the first and third set are nothing new with respect to and respectively. But the second set corresponds to a new symmetry not found in ordinary nuclei.

Clearly the interest in this type of investigations is partly to search for states displaying new aspects of symmetry and partly to assess the amount by which is broken in hypernuclei. Are the breakings of at the many body level (spectra of hypernuclei) and at the baryonic level (the octet) related?

It should also be mentioned that along the same lines above outlined a N potential has been derived. Since the experimental information, not to say the very existence, of the hypernuclei is still somewhat controversial, they will not be discussed here. Suffices it to say that the mean field acting on a appears to be quite shallow, with a substantial spin--orbit component ( a and a nucleon can exchange a pion or a rho) and the associated states are characterized by a large width (30 or 40 MeV), mainly associated with the strong decay channel

Various mechanisms have been explored that could reduce such a width, like Pauli blocking, dispersion effects, isospin selection rules etc., but the matter appears to be far from being settled.

In concluding this Section a brief reference should be made to hypernuclei with two particles. In principle they can be obtained from a --hypernucleus formed through the process (9). In fact the --hyperon can interact with a proton inside the nucleus according to

and a double-- hypernucleus can thus be formed with a certain probability. In practice the data are very scarce.

The importance of double-- hypernuclei relates to a large extent to the existence and stability of the H--particle predicted long ago by [10] as a six--quark bound state exceptionally stable and with a mass about 80 MeV below the decay threshold. The H particle is made up of two u, d and s quarks coupled to a flavor singlet and, when expressed in terms of two baryons configurations, reads

The H particle is still intensively searched for, but has not yet been convincingly found.


next up previous
Next: 4 Weak decay of Up: Chapter 12 Section 1 Previous: 2 Production of Hypernuclei



Carlos E.Piedrafita