Dear Graziano, Guido and Henryk,
      Thanks for all your work. These are my suggestions and comments on
the report. Please excuse me if some of them are irrelevant:
      Page     Comment
      0        I think that I should put only the following affiliation:
"Laboratoire de Physique Théorique (UMR 8627)
Université de Paris-Sud XI, Bâtiment 210
91405 Orsay cedex, France" and ask you to include the pre-print
number: LPT-ORSAY-09-95.
      0        There are spaces missing in affiliations 3 and 9, after
'Bologna,' and Alberta,', respectively.
      2        be -> been, at the top of RH column.
      7        () -> \left( \right) in the arguments of the ln and the
Li_2 functions in Eq. (9) and (10).
      7        can taken -> can be taken after reference to Eq. (10) in
paragraph below (10).
      13        Probably because of the size of Fig. 13, the last letters
in the lines of second paragraph are cut.
      16        Use of tabulation in Eqs. (30) and (31): the page looks
very empty there.
      17        In Eq.(35). In  D_{e\gamma} there appears P_{\gamma e}
instead of P_{e \gamma}. Is that right?
      21         In Eq.(59), () -> \left( \right) in the arguments of
D^{NS,\gamma}_{ee} functions.
      23        According to use in other parts of the review, I would
write Re, instead of R in Eq. (74) to express "real part of".
      28        As can be seen -> As it can be seen at the bottom and
below Table 7.
      30        I do not know why (there is no Figure in the RH column)
hte last lines of the last paragraph of the LH column are cut.
      34        amount -> amounts in second paragraph in LH column.
      36        "perturbative" goes from the LH columnn to the territory
of the RH column.
      38         llimit -> limit in first paragraph of RH column.
      38         2xE, Mev -> 2E(MeV) in the caption of Fig.31
      39         In Eq.(104), () -> \left( \right) in the arguments of
Li_2 functions.
      40         the ) are still at subindex size at the very bottom of
the page.
      45         Citation 339 invades RH column space.
      45         Is the s factor multiplying d\sigma... OK at the bottom
of the LH column?
      45         In other parts of the review, it is cited as Resonance
Chiral Theory, that although changed with respect to the original name
is better motivated.
      Throughout Section 4, Should every log be ln?
      46         4.4.3 )->4.4.3) at upper part of RH column.
      50         In Eq.(130), () -> \left( \right) in the arguments of f_e.
      52         In Eq.(150), () -> \left( \right) in the arguments of  
log (ln?)
      53,54      () -> \left( \right) in the arguments of log (ln?) in the
corresponding Eqs.
      57         The number of Eq. (194) overlaps with the last ) of
the formula.
      58         The y axis of Fig. 49 should be taken a bit downwards.
      59         'of the of the' -> 'of the' in the 2nd paragraph.
      59         'anyof' -> 'any of' in the third paragraph of the RH column.
      60          Numbering of Figs. Why is 51(a), 52(b), 53(a), 53(b) and
not 51(a), 51(b), 52(a), 52(b).
      60         In Fig.51(a), '2E, Mev' -> '2E(MeV)'.
      60         In caption of Fig.52 (b), 'c.m-energy' -> 'c.m. energy'.
      60         As has been explained -> As it has been explained.
      60         In Fig. 53(a), 'M^2, MeV^2'-> 'M^2 (MeV^2)'.
      60         In Fig. 54(b), 'E_photon' -> 'E_photon (GeV)'.
      60         In caption of Fig. 53(a), 'c.m-energy' -> 'c.m. energy'.
      60         Santamaria -> Santamaría
      61         'than is shown' -> 'than what is shown'
      67         \Gamma = 58 \pm 2 -> \Gamma = 58 \pm 2 MeV.
      68         () -> \left( \right) in Eq.
      72         'as has been done' -> 'as it has been done'
      73         Caption of Fig. 75b: A '-' is missing for the charged pion'.
      80         s3=(p_2+p_3)^2 -> s3=(p_1+p_2)^2
      80         resonance chiral approximation -> resonance chiral
theory (approximation?)
      81         At the bottom of LH column 'in 207' -> 'in Eq. 207'
      88         Right hand column. 'tau physics (section 6), ... on the
hadronic contributions (section 5)...with the exception of Section 5,'
-> 'tau physics (section 5), ... on the hadronic contributions
(section 6)...with the exception of Section 6,'
      89         'going' -> 'going' on the RH column.
      90         A ',' is missing between the last two RBFR grants.
      Ackowledgements: Would it be possible to add A. Pich, J. Portolés,
D. Gómez-Dumm, M. Jamin, Z.H. Guo (for the tau section)?
      References Correct format of [15], [258], [309]
      In Ref. [275] 'Vol.' appears twice.
      In Ref. [303] 'Bollaboration' -> 'Collaboration'.
      There appear different ways of writing  Czyz, Kuhn, Grzelinska,
(BaBar and BABAR), Was.
      In Ref. [427] the year appears twice.
      In Ref. [436] the symbol '~' is missing before 'rodrigo'.
      Ref. [450] starts with a '.' that shouldn not be there.
      It should be 'Gómez-Dumm' and 'Portolés' (not 'Gomez-Dumm' and
'Portoles').
      Our paper [510] will be splitted in two. Could we add both? They
will be published before the review appears (during this week and the
following one). I will provide you with the publication details
immediately they are submitted to the arXiv.
      Many many thanks.
      Warm Regards;
      Pablo
-- 
**************************************
PABLO ROIG GARCÉS
pablo.roig@ific.uv.es
http://ific.uv.es/~paroig/
IFIC - Instituto de Física Corpuscular
Centro mixto UVEG/CSIC
Edificio Institutos de Investigación
Apartado de Correos 22085
E-46071 Valencia - Espanya

Office: B.2.1
Phone:  +34 96 354 35 29
Fax  :  +34 96 354 34 88
**************************************






----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.