- ...form:
- A general presentation, and a
discussion in the framework of 119#119, can be found in
Ref. [12].
- ...be:
- Notice that different isospin phase conventions are adopted in
Refs. [5] and [12].
- ...[#kambor##1#],
- Actually, the fit of [5] is prior
to the recent determinations of the quadratic slope h for 148#148
[14], which is uncorrelated from constant and linear slopes, and of
149#149 [2]. These experimental results could
significantly improve the fit.
- ....
- If, conversely,
one attempted to infer 274#274 and 275#275 from 276#276 data, the
determination of 277#277 would remain consistent with that in Tab. 5, whereas
that of 278#278 would change considerably [22].
- ...diagrams,
- `Tadpole-like' diagrams, with loops
correcting the individual 340#340 and 341#341 vertices
of Fig. 2, are not depicted in Fig. 3.
- ...test.
- Actually, if measured, such imaginary parts
should be relevant also to 429#429, as they would unitarize
the leading order amplitude for that decay [32], because
in this case mass and energy scales are almost the same as in 430#430.
- ...stage.
- Numerical predictions for the 497#497
isospin amplitudes
in the framework of factorization and resonance-exchange have been worked
out in Ref. [43], choosing the (rather low) renormalization scale
498#498 for loop contributions. The 499#499-dependence of the results is
not discussed in this paper.
Carlos E.Piedrafita